By Rachel Pendergraft

Throughout history, non-white slavery has been utilized by whites to make life easier and to increase profit. The enslavement of whites by other whites also occurred on a large scale. However, it was without the same devastating effects.

It is true that whites have not always lived up to the idea of brotherly love. They have often behaved cruelly toward each other and often believed that some were made to be slaves and some to be masters. The slavery of whites by one another is based on the ancient institution of indentured servitude. While initially, it was intended to be for a determined length of time – under an intolerable master it often turned into a life long sentence for them and even their descendants. Fortunately, over the years, while slave families and master families retained their separate position, a mutual bond was formed, a community founded, and allegiances made toward one another. We find this occurring repeatedly between our white Israelite ancestors as recorded in Holy Scripture.

Though white slavery / indentured servitude may not have been an ideal situation – it did not end in tragedy. The children born out of the uniting of families were still white and the race flourished.

This was not so with the eventual enslavement of Negroes. The dynamic was often still the same – families still ended up bonding – communities forged. Yet, there remained one vital difference. The gene pool of the white community was destroyed forever. Long held morals and values were cast aside. Society degraded itself and collapsed. Time would stand still for the mixed race people while elsewhere in the world where race mixing had not occurred – the white race continued to advance toward a higher civilization.

The fight to stop the integration of the races is not new to our generation or even to this century or millennia.

Dr. Ed Fields, editor of The Truth at Last newspaper points out the ancient struggle to retain the purity of the white race. He says,”The ancient Egyptians saw the threat of the high Negro birth rate. Low-class and morally corrupt white Egyptians would mate with the black female slaves and produce mulattoes of low intelligence. In order to put a stop to the pollution of the Egyptian race, the pharaoh built a string of fortresses in Nubia at the second cataract with soldiers under orders to keep Negroes out of Upper Egypt. Sesostris the III (1878-1840 B.C.) had the following wording engraved on the fort, which remains at Semneh to this day:

It reads: ‘Southern boundary under the majesty of the King of Upper and Lower Egypt, Sesostris III, in order to prevent any Negro to pass it, by water or by land with a ship, or any herds of the Negroes, except a Negro who shall come to do trading in Iken or with a commission. Every good thing shall be done with them but without allowing a ship of the Negroes to pass forever.”

Dr. Fields continues, “Slowly but surely these barriers were broken down when greedy men, whose purse was more important than maintaining the purity of the White race in Egypt, (Despite what you hear during Black History month – it was the white race that built the mighty Egyptian empire) smuggled in blacks in violation of the law. Today, Egypt is a totally mongrelized nation which has lost its greatness for all time to come.”

Jews Dominated the Ancient Slave Trade

While whites practiced indentured servitude – and eventually took on the actual practice of slavery – it was the Jew who made it a business.

Rabbi Lewis Browne, in the book Stranger Than Fiction, p. 196, says that,”under the tolerant rule of the Mohammedans, the Jews began slavery and began to prosper. They, who had been poor and bedraggled peddlers for centuries, now became wealthy and powerful traders. They traveled everywhere, from England to India, from Bohemia to Egypt. Their commonest merchandise in those days was slaves. On every highroad and on every great river and sea, these Jewish traders were to be found with their gangs of shackled prisoners in convoy.”

Albert Hyamson in A History of the Jews in England says;”The British slaves who, in the Roman market place, attracted the attention of King Gregory, and directed it toward Britain, were most probably introduced into Italy by Jewish merchants.”

Jews in America

On August 2, 1492, the great Queen Isabella of Spain, pictured left, expelled the Jews. Their control of the banking houses and national finance had caused the near destruction of the nation. After the Jews were expelled, Spain experienced a rebirth in economics, culture, and religion.

Many of the Jews immigrated to Holland, where they set up the Dutch West Indies Company to exploit the new world. In 1654, the first Jew, Jacob Barsimson, emigrated from Holland to New Amsterdam (New York) and in the next decade many more followed him, settling all through out the East Coast, but mostly in New Amsterdam and Newport, Rhode Island.

The colonists were very wary of the effect Jews would have on the local economy and communities.

Why the Concern?

Every nation of Europe has at one time or another expelled the Jews. Sometimes a nation, after forgetting the turmoil Jews cause , would subsequently allow their reentrance. Soon, however, the Jews would be expelled a second or even third time

Louis Finkelstein, was professor of theology at the Jewish Theological Seminary of America. In 1946 in papers published by the Jewish Publication Society of America, he writes:

“Pharisaism became Talmudism, Talmudism became Medieval Rabbinism, and Medieval Rabbinism became Modern Rabbinism. But, throughout these changes of name, inevitable adaptation of custom, and adjustment of Law, the spirit of the ancient Pharisee survives unaltered. When the Jew reads his prayers, he is reciting formulae prepared by pre-Maccabean scholars; when he dons the cloak prescribed for the Day of Atonement, he is wearing the festival garment of ancient Jerusalem; when he studies the Talmud, he is actually repeating the arguments used in the Palestinian academes. From Palestine to Babylonia; from Babylonia to North Africa, Italy, Spain, France, and Germany; from these to Poland, Russia, and Eastern Europe generally”

The Colonists were Christians and they remembered the words of their Religious Leaders

The Catholic Popes of old and the founders of Protestantism including Martin Luther warned against the depraved thinking of the Jews and their subsequent effect on the morals of society. Christian founders of America warned against harmful Jewish influence which included the undermining of the family, education, and banking. Moreover, Christian ministers until recent years warned their congregations.

The great Pope Gregory VII writes in a letter to King Alfonse VI of Castile in the year 1081,”We exhort your Royal Majesty, not to further tolerate, that the Jews rule Christians and have power over them. For to allow, that Christians are subordinated to Jews and are delivered to their whims, means to oppress the Church of God, means to revile Christ himself.”

St. John Chrisysostom described the Jews as a “Nation of criminals, lustful robbers and avaricious false thieves.” In response to the Jewish anthem that they are always being persecuted and are only innocent victims, he says, “Always when the Jews say to you: Men have waged war upon us and have conspired against us, answer them: men would not have waged war upon you, if God had not allowed it.”

The Holy Pius V, another saint of the Church, who is renowned on account of his Christian neighborly love and one of the most highly regarded of Popes said, “Since we, as is necessary, wish to remedy this deceit which Jews are continually committing, with full understanding and in exercising of the apostolic powers, we withdraw from the Jews and their rule all properties, which the Jews have in their possession in this city of Rome or other places of our domain of rule.”

Martin Luther, whose words were probably known more to the largely Protestant population of the new world than any other said:

“The Jews are the real liars and bloodhounds, who have not only perverted and falsified the entire scriptures from beginning to end and without ceasing with their interpretations, have lied to and deceived the people. And all of their anxious sighing, longing and hope of their hearts is directed to the time when some day they would like to deal with us heathen (Christian) as they dealt with the heathen of Persia at the the time of Esther. Oh, how they love that book Esther, which so nicely agrees with their bloodthirsty, revengeful and murderous desire and hope! (Many Bible authorities believe that the book of Esther should not have been included in the Holy Canon.) The sun never did shine on a more bloodthirsty and revengeful people as they who imagine to be the people of God who desire to and they think they must murder and crush the heathen.”

“Even now the Jews cannot give up their insane, raving boast, that they are the chosen people of God; there is no promise for on which they could lean for comfort, except what they smear into the Scriptures according to their own imaginations.”

“Therefore know, my dear Christian, that next to the Devil you have no more bitter, more poisonous, more vehement an enemy than a real Jew who earnestly desires to be a Jew.”

Jews Restricted from the Domestic Economy

Jews were restricted from participating in the local economy. Their treachery and manipulation of banking and commerce necessitated their exclusion.

However, there was nothing restricting them from trading with the Indians who were nations unto themselves.

The first Jew to begin trading with the Indians was Hayman Levy. The Indians were fascinated with items of self- adornment; beads, earrings, armbands, and cloth. These were traded for fur pelts. Soon Jews Nicholas Lowe and Joseph Simon joined Levy in his venture. They decided to begin trading rum and whiskey to the Indians and set up a distillery in Newport. In a very short time there were 22 distilleries in Newport, all owned by Jews.”Firewater” soon became a coveted possession of the Indians resulting in the tragic massacres of early settlers.

White Slavery in the Colonies

As stated earlier, indentured servitude or the use of “bond servants” is an ancient institution. If the practice was followed according to Biblical mandates, it could be very useful to all involved parties. However, in many cases at the hands of evil despots, it resulted in outright slavery.

While each nation of Europe systematically exiled the Jews for their domination and control of finance, the good natured and forgiving Christian would eventually let them back in. Soon they would find themselves caught up once again in the web of Jewish manipulation.

At the founding of America by white Christians, we find the nations of Europe once again in hawk to Jewish usury. To the modern casual observer, it may appear that the old monarchies held exclusive power. Yet, that is not the case. Through deceitful means the Jews would always rise to be the guardians if not outright’ the majority owners of a nations wealth. Just as it is today when a politician must cater to the demands of the Jewish elite or risk the loss of career and fortune, so it was in Europe as well. The result was outrageous tax laws, exorbitant usury rates, and millions of desperately poor whites.

When a nation was in economic crisis, the question was – what to do with the poor. The new world offered hope to many poor whites. Likewise, the monarchy viewed the new world as an answer to the problem of the rising underclass or working poor.

L. Ruchames in, “The Sources of Racial Thought in Colonial America,” states that,”the slave trade worked in both directions, with white merchandise as well as black.” (Journal of Negro History, no. 52, pp. 251-273)

Dr. Hilary McD. Meckles of the University of Hull, England, writes about White slave labor,”..indenture contracts were alienable. The ownership of which could easily be transferred, like that of any other with slaves, ownership changed without their participation in the dialogue concerning transfer.” (The Americas, vol. 41, no. 2, p. 21)

17th and 18th century economists advocated the enslavement of poor whites because they saw them as the cheapest and most effective way to develop the colonies. (Essays Toward the Regulation of Trade {London, 1719} p. 48) It was believed that by making slaves out of poor whites and sending them to the new world, they would no longer be”chargeable and unprofitable to the Realm.”

In February, 1652 it was enacted that:

“ may be lawful for two or more justices of the peace within any county, city or towne corporate belonging to this commonwealth to from tyme to tyme by warrant..cause to be apprehended seized on and detained all and every person or persons that shall be found begging and any towne, parish or place to be conveyed into the port of London, or unto any other port…from where such person or persons may be shipped..into any foreign colony or plantation..” (Egerton manuscript, British Museum).

In Britain, slave raids, otherwise known as “spiriting” began under the reign of King Charles I. It was an organized system of kidnapping English, Welsh and Scottish workers, and transporting them to the colonies to be sold. Over 100,000 Irish men, women, and children were sold into slavery in the West Indies alone.

White slaves were actually owned by Negroes and Indians in the South to such an extent that the Virginia Assembly passed the following law in 1670:”it is enacted that noe Negro or Indian though baptized and enjoyned their owne freedome shall be capable of any such purchase of Christians..” (Statutes of the Virginia Assembly, Vol. 2, pp. 280-281)

Thousands of whites in colonial America were owned outright by their masters and died in slavery. Upon arrival in America, white slaves were”put up for sale by the ship captains or merchants….families were often separated under these circumstances when wives and offspring were auctioned off to the highest bidder.” Foster R. Dulles, Labor in America; A History, p. 7)

Of course, there was a fortunate class of whites who could in fact be called”indentured servants”. They worked under privileged conditions for a specific period. Benjamin Franklin was one such person. As a young man, Franklin was once mistaken for a fugitive white slave, and in danger of being taken up on that suspicion.

However, claiming that most “white slaves” were actually indentured servants counteracts all documentary evidence.

The justification for white slavery was often permitted on the claim that those enslaved were criminals. Yet often ones enslavement, proved one a criminal. Hundreds of laws in Britain, at the urging of an elite class, made so-called crimes such as taking an apple, to destroying shrubbery in an aristocrat’s garden, punishable by death. The toppling of the agricultural class and taking of their land by Jewish usury forced hundreds of thousands of poor into the streets of the cities. Often left with no other choice but to steal food or beg, entire families, or women and children with no where to turn were pegged as criminals and sold to planters in the new world. These”criminals” would arguably be given freedom in 20 or 30 years, but most died before then. White slaves were forbidden to marry, as were those who could be more genuinely called an indentured servant. Children born to them out of wedlock became automatic servants for a period of 31 years. The parents would have their time of servitude extended indefinitely.

Unlike the guidelines for indentured servitude cited in the Bible, it was most often not followed during the colonizing of America. Deuteronomy mandates that a bondsman is not to be oppressed. Exodus says that under no circumstance is the time to exceed six years. And Leviticus forbids forced slavery for the payment of debts as well as child slavery.

Dutch Jews and the White Slave Trade

The following quote is from Michael Hoffman’s book, They Were White and Slaves,”In the British West Indies much of the early capital to finance White slavery came from Sephardic Jews from Holland. They provided credit, machinery and shipping facilities. In the 1630s, Dutch Jews had been deeply involved in the enslavement of the Irish, financing their transport to slave plantations in the tropics. By the 1660’s, this combination of Jewish finance and White slave labor made the British island colony of Barbados the riches in the empire. The island’s value, in terms of trade and capital exceeded that of all other British colonies combined. (John Oldmixon, The British Empire in America, Vol. 2, p. 186)

Of the fact that the wealth of Barbados was founded on the backs of White slave labor there can be no doubt. White slave laborers from England and Ireland were the mainstay of the sugar colonies. Until the mid – 1640’s there were almost no Blacks in Barbados. George Downing wrote to John Winthrop, the colonial governor of Massachusetts in 1645 that planters who wanted to make a fortune in the British West Indies must procure White slave labor “out of England” if they wanted to succeed. (Elizabeth Donnon, Documents Illustrative of the history of the Slave Trade to America, pp. 1250126).

From their experience with rebellious Irish slaves, Dutch Jews would eventually be instrumental in the switch from White to Black slavery in the British West Indies. Blacks were more docile and more profitable for the Jews. Gradually a shift occurred. However, Through out the 17th and 18th century, the tobacco, sugar and cotton colonies maintained a sizable white slave population. Negro slaves simply cost too much to import and purchase. Whites were cheaper (castoffs from Britain) and more expendable.

As more whites began to appreciate the suffering of their fellow white brothers and sisters and resistance to white slavery set in, the institution became more costly. Families were eventually formed and large settlements of former white slaves and poor whites settled the hill country throughout the colonies where they farmed small plots of land.

Jews Find Negro Slavery to Be More Profitable

Aaron Lopez  of Newport bought such ships as The Greyhound, The African, The Besey, the Prince George, and the Spry. The biography of Lopez states that he would offer rewards to sea captains who brought back the healthiest slaves. The Jews of Newport owned some 300 rum and slave ships. Jewish distilleries made a profit selling to the Jewish ship owners and the Jewish ship owners in turn made a profit selling Negro slaves.

Other powerful Jews of Newport in the slave trade included Moses Levy who owned The Abigail, Four Sisters, and Nassau; Sam Levey who owned The Charlotte and the Caracoa; James DeWoolf who owned Polly and Betsy; David Gomez who owned The Elizabeth and Hester. Other Jews who were smaller operators or distillers were Naphtaly Myers, David Hart, Joseph Jacobs, Moses Ben Franks, Isaac Dias, Benjamin levy, David Jeshuvum, Jacob Pinto, Jacob Turk, James Lucana, Jan de Sweevts, Felix de Souza, Simeon Potter, Jacob Rod, Jacob Rivera, Haym Carregal, Abraham Touro, Moses Hays, Moses Lopez, Judah Touro, Abraham Mendes, and Abraham All.

Large Negro Population Worries the Colonists – Laws are Passed

As abhorrent as the treatment of many of the early whites by other whites were, it could never compare to the overall crisis that a large Negro slave population imposed upon every white person in America whether a free person, slave, or servant.

The Negro was originally viewed as a docile being who would easily succumb to a master’s orders – unlike the former”indentured servants or white slaves” who would not tolerate anything but self rule. And in small numbers, the Negro did adjust well to plantation life. The Negro is often described as having a”pack” mentality. Negroes do not start becoming unruly until their population grows in proportion to whites.

And so it was with the slave population, which was growing at extraordinary rates. For example, in South Carolina in 1715 Negroes out numbered whites by 10,500 to 6,250.

Georgia which had originally been colonized heavily by white slaves, indentured servants, and tax”criminals” from England, banned slavery outright in her Organic Act when formed in 1735. The Colonists were making a point to ridicule the British commercial slavery policy. The colonists were viewed as rabble by Britain, and now they were being forced to put up with a growing Negro threat.

“An Act for rendering the Colony of Georgia more defensible by Prohibiting the Importation and use of Black Slaves or Negroes in the same“ It reads as follows:

“Whereas experience hath shown that the manner of settling colonies and plantations with black slaves or Negroes hath obstructed the increase of English and Christian inhabitants therein who alone can incase of a war be relied on for the defense and security of the same, and hath exposed the colonies so settled to the insurrections, tumults and rebellions of such slaves and Negroes and the case of a rupture with any foreign state who should encourage and support such rebellions might occasion ruin and loss of such colonies.”

In April 1772, the Virginia Assembly met and sent a message to the King warning that the Negroes now outnumber the whites in the area 2 to 1. They had become an obvious threat to the colonists and their children.

Eventually the slavery of whites in the British West Indies had waned and it had become less acceptable. Jews had begun bringing in huge populations of Negro slaves. Descendents of the white slaves in these areas, who likewise had grown into sizable populations, were still extremely outnumbered by the new black slaves. Unlike the Irish, previously, who had resisted enslavement in a civilized manner usually by attempting escape or rising up against those actually responsible for his enslavement, the Negro slaves engaged in a blood bath – slaughtering every man, woman, and child. The gruesome news of these horrendous acts rightly scared the colonists.

The Virginia Assembly in 1772 issued the following proclamation:

“The people of this colony must fall upon means not only of preventing their increase, but also of lessening their number; and in the interest of the country would manifestly require the total expulsion of them.

“The importation of slaves into the colonies from the coast of Africa hath long been considered as a trade of great inhumanity; and under its present encouragement we have too much reason to fear will endanger the very existence of our majesty’s American dominions. Some of our majesty subjects in Great Britain may reap emoluments (great wealth) from this sort of traffic; but, when we consider that it greatly retards the settlement of the colonies with more useful inhabitants, and may in time have the most destructive influence, we presume to hope the interest of a few will be disregarded, when placed in competition with the security and happiness of such numbers of our majesty’s dutiful and loyal subjects. Deeply impressed with these sentiments we most humbly beseech your majesty to remove all those restraints on your majesty’s governors of this colony which inhibit their assenting to such laws as might check so pernicious a commerce.”

Jews and White Elite Fight for Continuation of Negro Slave Trade / Resentment Ensues

Georgia was protected by their anti-slave law until 1750 when it was repealed at the urging of the large plantation owners who sought cheap slave labor. The small white farmers still supported the slave ban. The average white man and woman indeed had reason to fear the growing black population.

Many of the common white men and women, the working poor and middle class, descendents of white slavery or white slaves themselves, were incensed at the British use of Negroes in the militia of the aristocracy. White men who were promised land upon release from servitude were systematically denied. The owners of large plantations with ties and allegiance to the crown would arm part of their blackmen to assist in running white families off the better land and into the hill land.

Whites who fled slavery had to scratch out an existence as subsistence farmers where they existed in extreme poverty, forming peasant communities in the hills. They were mocked and scorned by the majority of the wealthy white planter elite as well as by Negroes. Small farmers were referred to as”red shanks” and”red legs,” and”poor-white earth scratching scum.”.

This growing resentment by vast numbers of white colonists toward the crown was beneficial. These colonists had been instilled with a sense of fighting zeal.

During the American Revolution, the Continental Congress permitted the recruitment of white slaves into the army, thus granting to them their freedom.

These men had anger toward Britain and the Continental army found this to be very useful in winning Independence.


One such man was Matthew Lyon. He was orphaned at 14 years of age when his father along with other leaders of the”White Boys” an Irish farmers’ group organized to resist British government confiscation of their farmlands, were executed. The boy was enslaved and transported to America where a wealthy Connecticut merchant bought him.

By the spring of 1775, Matthew Lyon had taken up the offer of freedom if he joined the fight for American Independence. He joined a band of guerilla fighters that later appeared out of nowhere at Ticonderoga in northern New York. Their commander, Ethan Allen, demanded the surrender of the mighty British fort. Lyon rose to the rank of Colonel and fought the British at the battles of Bennington and Saratoga. He had joined the infamous Green Mountain Boys. He became a founder of the state of Vermont and elected to its assembly and later to the U.S. Congress. He became very wealthy after discovering that paper could be made from wood pulp. Two grandsons were decorated war heroes and served as generals – one on the Union side and one on the Confederate side.

Negro Slavery Was a Primary Issue in the American Revolution – America wanted it stopped – Britain said”NO!”

Thomas Jefferson, in an early draft of the Declaration of Independence wanted included the following wording by George Mason:

“By prompting our Negroes to rise in arms against us, these very Negroes, whom by an inhuman use of his negative he hath refused us permission to exile (from the nation) by law”

(King George had urged the Negroes in America to support the British Army and join them in taking up arms against the Whites. In effect, he was urging a bloody slave revolt!)

New Orleans lawyer and historian Drew L. Smith wrote on the grievances leading up to the Declaration of Independence on July 4, 1776:

“There was one flagrant act of which the British King was guilty that did not appear in the Declaration. That act was the King’s repeated refusal to stop the African slave trade into the American provinces. In deed, his continued rejection of colonial appeals to bar Negro importation into the colonies was the most important reason for the Declaration of Independence. It far transcended all other acts of tyranny by the British Crown.”

Jefferson wrote that while some wanted to simply free the slaves, there was the problem of”what further is to be done with them?” He said that it was one thing for the Romans to free White slaves whom,”when made free might mix (interbreed) without staining the blood of his master…when freed (the Negroes) must be removed beyond the reach of mixture.”

Indeed time and time again, the colonies passed laws to reduce or ban the importation of Negro slaves only to have the laws overturned by the King. On Dec. 10, 1770, King George III issued instructions commanding the Royal Governor of Virginia,”under pain of the highest displeasure, to assent to no law by which the importation of slaves should be in any respect prohibited or obstructed.”

A Summary and the Devastating Results

The British crown, in debt to the interests of organized Jewry attempted to solve their financial woes by extracting incredulous amounts of money from the people, running them off their land, and finally selling them into slavery to their own racial kin in America. Not always treated according to Biblical mandates, men, women, and children finding themselves to be white slaves in the new world grew resentful of Jews and fellow Whites who maintained an elitist attitude.

Their resentment gave way to a powerful incentive in fighting the British crown during the American Revolution. The British Crown, Jewish fanciers, and white elitists joined in holding down the average white person and using the once thought docile Negro against them – who had – revolts had shown- to harbor a bloodthirsty hatred of white people. Their growing population threatened all Americans whether free, indentured, or slave. Whatever the status, whites were the target of Negro savagery.

White elitists, including many large plantation owners, turned their backs upon their fellow white brothers and sisters in favor of cheap labor (much like the large corporations of today) and looked down upon the working and middle class whites with scorn and ridicule.

Still, there were many wealthy whites – without an elitist attitude – who feared the growing and violent Negro slavery institution and joined in with their fellow concerned neighbors to fight for American Independence. It was the desire for fair treatment of all whites that caused the phrase”all men are created equal” to appear in the Declaration. This did not involve the Negro. Our forefathers were concerned about the treatment of whites. Unfortunately, while Independence was won. The Negro problem was never solved.

Thomas Jefferson drew up a plan to send the slaves back to Africa – but it was never followed through on.

In just a little under 100 years, the descendents of white slavery would find themselves at odds with the huge Negro population and the white aristocracy. The southern states in succeeding from the Union had outlawed the importation of any more slaves – but it was too late. The damage had been done. Poor whites were forced to compete against Negro slave labor. Jobs were few. Negro slaves were expensive. However, as an investment they had to be treated well, receiving adequate food, clothing and medication even as poor whites in the same town sickened and died from disease and malnutrition. While the War between States, the Civil War, or the War of Northern Aggression (whatever your preference) is often cited as only a one or two issue war. (slavery or states rights). It was a many sided issue at that time and not as easily split along geographic lines as some would like to believe.

Some of the leaders of the Free Soil Party and many of the abolitionist soldiers who made up the ranks of Lincoln’s armies in Southern Ohio, western North Carolina, eastern Tennessee, southern Illinois, Kentucky and elsewhere were survivors of white slavery or else descendants. They did not view themselves as advocates of what was then referred to as racial”amalgamation.” Historically they regarded themselves as separatists and viewed the Southern planters’ desire to spread Negroes into California, Oregon and other territories as a grave threat to free white labor and the Biblical principle of racial separation.

Congressman David Wilmot of Iowa sponsored a law to ban Black slavery in the American West. He called the law, ‘the white Man’s Proviso.” He was bitterly opposed by the Southern and Eastern elite. He told Congress that he intended to preserve America’s western frontier for ”the sons of toil, my own race and color.” (Charles Going, David Wilmot: Free-Soiler, p. 74)

One East Coast Establishment leader who did support racial amalgamation was Justin D. Fulton, a Boston minister popular in leftist circles. He wrote in 1869:

“Much is said against amalgamation, as though it were a crime. There is no crime in it or about it. There is much of prejudice, but no crime. If a white man loves a black woman, there is no law in God’s code forbidding the union. In this intermingling of races, coming to this land from all climes, we perceive the seedling of a glorious hope. The future American is to be the product of this blending of the distinctive features of all the various races of earth. Against this result, there is an immense amount of prejudice; but not in Europe, it does not exist. Many a white man has found his help-mate in a black woman, and many more will find help-mates from the same source.”

Yet, the majority of Northerners were opposed to race mixing. Their insistence to the abolition of slavery was not for the most part out of consideration for Negroes, but rather for the poor whites that had to compete against cheap labor. In fact, in most northern states, Negroes were not even allowed unless posting a large bond or if in the company of his master.

“A large number of white southerners lived in the upcountry, an area of small farmers and herdsmen – engaged largely in mixed and subsistence agriculture..little currency circulated, barter was common and upcountry families dressed in ‘home-spun cloth, the product of the spinning wheel and the hand-loom.’ This economic order gave rise to a distinctive sub-culture that celebrated mutuality, egalitarianism (for whites) and independence “.

Poor whites had to be drafted into the Confederate army. As in the North, where resistance to conscription was widespread, many Southern Whites saw the conflict as”a rich man’s war and a poor man’s fight.” Indeed, any slaveholder owning 20 or more Negro slaves was exempt from military combat.

Abraham Lincoln purchased Liberia for the repatriation of the slaves back to Africa. Over 20,000 were returned. His assassination ended the repatriation policy as well as the Lincoln Green back – constitutional currency. John Wilkes Booth, agent of the Rothchild banking family did the deed. And lest we forget the manipulation by both Northern and Southern Jewish propagandists – who are always the only ones to win when it comes down to wars for profit – though on the surface it may be said to be fought for an ideal.

Nathan Bedford Forrest initially accepted a post with the Union Army, but joined confederate forces when fighting hit close to home. The immediate safety of his family was his primary concern. Later, as the leader of the Ku Klux Klan, he required all Klansmen to pledge allegiance to the U.S. Constitution. The point being that the reason for fighting on either side wasn’t always as clear cut as we would believe. The early Klan wasn’t engaged in fighting”northerners”, but rather scoundrels with an elitist attitude – some who came from the North and some who came from the South.

In New York, a riot broke out for 5 days, when the draft was imposed. Negroes were the target of rage. Northern farm boys did not want to fight for”their inferno Negroes”

Some northern counties succeeded and joined the Confederacy due to their strong belief in states rights. These were often areas of heavy and recent Irish immigration, who had the actions of the centralized government of England fresh in their minds. They fought against the idea of federalism. Ironically today, we see some homosexual groups clamoring in support of states’ rights. They say an individual state has the right to legalize same sex”marriage” even if the federal government does not.

Plague upon our People

In conclusion, the Negro has been a plague upon our people since their first arrival to America. But, we must remember that they did not build boats – never have- and sail here on their own. Neither did white people begin the practice of human trafficking.

Those of vision in the past could see the ramifications of a large Negro population and worked to prevent it. Just as today, we can see the problems that will arise from increased non-white immigration. Yet, the corporate elitists, in their walled communities, backed by Jewish finance and in fact indebted to them, do everything within their power to keep the cheap labor coming in. While middle class America must pay the consequences of an ever-increasing non-white population.

Our people are continually hooked by the propagandist’s message: How cruel not to let these people come and share the wealth – it’s the American way – it’s the Christian way. All the while, our people look around and wonder what is going on – things do not seem right. They keep voting for whoever will tell them the things they want to hear. Their actions are similar to some of those early colonists who looked the other way at the suffering of their fellow whites (the indentured) they are content to complain as long as it does not affect them.

Grasp on to the Vision of a safe America for Free White Christian Men, Women, and Children

It prompted the First Revolution – Let it Motivate us This time Around

We can blame the Negro, we can blame the Mexican, the Asian, or the Jew – the master manipulator – but we as a people hear what we want to hear, and believe what we want to believe. In the end, the problem is of our own making. We can let our self be manipulated, we can turn a deaf ear to our brothers and sisters – whether they know they need us or not – and we can selfishly stick our heads in the sand.

I urge each of you to not make the mistakes of the past, but learn from them. Grasp on to the vision that so many of our great diplomats of the past had – a land of self-governed white Christian men and women. Our people haven’t always lived up to the honorable expectations the Lord has of us. Nevertheless, he commands us to never stop trying. We are to love each other whether we are hated for it or not. Let us make our visionary ancestors proud and continue the battle on behalf of our national and racial liberty.